Does “Ad Blare” send you scrambling for your TV remote?
For years it’s annoyed the hell out of me that the volume of my TV seems to leap from “just perfect, thanks” to “crass, blaring moron” as soon as the ads come on. As though this will somehow encourage me to pay more, rather than less attention.

And every time I reach for my remote to kill the volume (or with MySky, to pause the ads, then fast forward past them completely), I ask myself the same question: "Don’t advertisers and ad agencies care that viewers like me are lowering, muting, or skipping their ads to avoid Ad Blare?"
Well, a meddlesome new piece of legislation being proposed in the US by Senator Anna Eshoo - covered here by Parade Magazine - may have provided the answer. And it appears to be, No.
The legislation is the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act. That’s right… the CALM Act (shudders involuntarily). But what grabbed my attention most, was the bit where a Saatchi & Saatchi director advocates that: “legislation isn’t necessary since new televisions are equipped with technology that can easily mitigate the problem, i.e. a TV remote.”
Hang on a second…
Quick rewind… that’s the head of TV production at one of the largest ad agencies in the world, effectively saying: “No, we don’t want a law that makes TV ads the same volume as TV shows. We want viewers to turn down or mute the ads paid for with billions of dollars of our client’s money.”
What?! I think Saatchi & Saatchi clients deserve better than that. In fact I think all advertisers deserve better than that. Here as well as in the US.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t think anyone needs a meddlesome law to force down the volume of TV ads. I think common sense should prevail. But clearly it isn’t.
Not when the advertising industry is tacitly and implicitly encouraging viewers to turn ads down, or worse… off, just to ‘mitigate the problem’ of their eardrums taking a completely unnecessary hammering during commercial breaks.
What do you think: does Ad Blare bother you too? Is a law needed, or going too far? Are the best interests of advertisers being ignored for the sake of an annoying and quite possibly counter productive volume boost gimmick?
Ad Agencies,
Ad Blare,
Advertisers 



